-
Controversial Nigerian cross-dresser, Bobrisky has, Bobrisky has responded following law suite from Falana.
-
In a recent statement, Bobrisky denied all accusations, asking Falana to blame the defamatory statements on VDM
Popular Crossdresser, Idris Okuneye, popularly known as Bobrisky has beckon on popular lawyer and human rights activist, Femi Falana, and his son, Falz to hold popular critic, Verydarkman responsible for any form of defamation.
Daily Report Nigeria recalls that the Falana had asked Verydarkman, through the Nigerian court to pull down all defamatory contents on his social media handles.
In recent news, the Falana also sued Bobrisky the sum of ten million naira for defamation of character.
Bobrisky clarified that he, contradictory to VDM’s claims, he never gave Falana or his son any money to get a presidential pardon during his prison ordeal.
Bobrisky said,
“I Okuneye Idris aka Bobrisky didn’t give Falz or his dad any money for pardon. As a matter of fact, no penny was given to them. Have said this before and I will say it again. The person that published an audio online should take full responsibility for what he posted in public.
“My lawyer will respond to any further information the public wants about this ongoing issue trending on social media,” Bobrisky wrote on his Instagram story on Wednesday.
Also Read: Don Jazzy Revealed as Mystery Donor of N100m to VeryDarkMan’s NGO
In another post, the crossdresser wrote,
“In reply to the two letters in circulation from the law firm of the Falanas. I like to state for the records and pending the official reply from my counsel, state for the avoidance of doubt that I Okuneye Idris Olarewaju aka Bobrisky did not publish any defamatory statement or statements concerning the learned SAN and his son Falz and that in the public domain pursuant to my solicitor’s letter dated the 27th day of September 2024 that I have denied any knowledge of what VDM published.
“I stand to express denial and put the matter to strict proof and advise that whoever has been defamed should hold the publisher of defamatory content and my fundamental rights to privacy of my communications should be respected and protected. Best.”
Leave a comment