Gbajabiamila Orders Withdrawal of Water Resources Bill Amidst Rowdy Session
The Federal House of Representatives has withdrawn the controversial National Water Resources Bill, 2020, following a rowdy session during Tuesday’s plenary session.
The Green chamber was thrown into a turmoil on Tuesday, while considering a Matter of Privilege raised by Rep. Benjamin Mzondu (PDP-Benue) to be heard on the contentious National Water Resources Bill, 2020.
774,000 Jobs: Ministry Increases Slots For NASS
Mzonduās motion sought the withdrawal of the Bill, owing to the public outcry against it and its outright breach of House Rules.
ATTENTION:Ā Click āHEREā to join our WhatsApp group and receive News updates directly onĀ your WhatsApp!
In presenting his Matter of Privilege, Rep. Mzondu cited Order 6, Rule 1(1), 2 and 3, as he argued forcefully, against the transmission of the Bill to the Senate and its finally becoming law.
According to him, āI wish to refer to Order 6, Rule 1(1), 2 and 3 and Order 12, Rule 18 to state that I was deprived of my legislative Privilege of sighting a gazetted copy of the National Water Resources BillHB 921, and such could not participate in the consideration of the report by the Committee of the Whole, which also deprived me of my rights and privilege of representation to my people.
āMr. Speaker, Hon. Colleagues, it is in the effort to eliminate the āElement of Surpriseā, that the House in its wisdom, included in its Standing Rule, that every Bill, must be gazetted or clean copies circulated. It is important to note that the word emphasized here, is āgazetteā, which means appearing in the Bills Journal of the House.
āThe words used are clear and unambiguous, they ought to be given their ordinary meaning, as stated.
āMr. Speaker, Hon. Colleagues, I was misled by the use of order 12, Rule 18 of our Standing Orders. Mr. Speaker, Hon. Colleagues, it is an issue of law and procedure, and Hon. Speaker, the onus of interpretation, lies with you. Where the Bill was labeled as Bill 2020, it was not considered as such.
āThe laws lay, on your shoulder to interpret these rules as stated in Order 7 Rule 1(7). It is important to emphasize that I have painstakingly searched through all the journals of the House, and cannot find where the Bill is gazetted and I stand to be challenged or corrected.
āThe next question for your consideration, Hon. Speaker, deals with jurisdiction, whether the House have such powers to entertain a bill, such proceedings become a nullity, ab initio no matter how conducted and decidedā.
ā So having not met this condition, I wish to move, relying on Order 8 Rule 8 and the above-stated rules, that āThe House do rescind/expunge its decision of 23rd July 2020, which adopted the National Water Resources Bill, 2020 HB921 to have been read the Third time from our recordsā.
Mzondu’s latter prayers were granted, after a prolonged debate from both sides of the legislative divide, as the Speaker ordered for the withdrawal of Bill.
āFundamental issues have been raised by Hon. Mzondu. He has backed them up, with a clear language, that such bills, must be re-gazettedā, Gbajabiamila said.
However, the Deputy Speaker of the House, Rep. Idris Wase argued against Mzonduās position, stressing that the Bill followed due process in its passage.
Waseās argument was buttressed by the sponsor of the Bill, Rep. Sada Soli(APC-Katsina), and the Chairman of the Rules and Business Committee, Rep.Hassan Fulata(APC-Jigawa).
Lawmakers, led by Rep. Kingsley Chinda(PDP-Rivers), however, put up a strong defense for Mzonduās submission, leading to the decision of the Speaker to Order for the withdrawal of the Bill, for a fresh gazetting.
Recall that the same Bill which was earlier introduced as Executive Bill was killed in the Senate, but passed in the House. The instrument, however, couldnāt be retransmitted to the Senate for Senateās concurrence before the 8th Assembly lapsed.
Leave a Reply