Home Politics Tribunal Admits US Court Judgment on Tinubu’s Drug Case as Evidence
Politics

Tribunal Admits US Court Judgment on Tinubu’s Drug Case as Evidence

Share
Tribunal Admits Judgment on Tinubu’s Drug Case as Evidence
Share

The Presidential Election Petition Court, on Tuesday in Abuja admitted in evidence, a United States of America (USA) District Court judgment which reportedly indicted Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu and ordered his forfeiture of $460,000 in drug-related offences.

The certified true copy of the judgment was tendered by a witness, Barrister Lawrence Uchechukwu Nnana Nwakaeti, at the commencement of the hearing of a petition filed by the Presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) Mr Peter Gregory Obi, against the election of Tinubu.

Led in evidence by Mr Jibrin Okutepa, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN, the witness tendered the Court’s judgment as part of requests by Obi and the Labour Party to get Tinubu’s declaration as winner of the February 25, 2023, presidential election nullified and set aside.

However, Tinubu and the All Progressives Congress (APC) announced that they have objections against the admission of the judgment but reserved the objections to the final address stage.

READ ALSO: Fresh Revelation on Tinubu’s Alleged Drug Case Emerges

Under cross-examination by Chief Wole Olanipekun SAN, who stood for President Tinubu, the witness admitted that the judgment was not registered in Nigeria.

The Anambra-based legal practitioner, who was Obi’s first witness, also admitted that there was no certificate from any Consular in Nigeria or America in support of the judgment but insisted that “the judgment speaks for itself”.

He claimed to have been to the US and read the judgment in its entirety, adding that he would be surprised if no mention was made of a $460,000 forfeiture.

Also under cross-examination by counsel to the APC, Prince Lateef Fagbemi SAN, the witness said that the American court judgment had no certificate given under the hand of any American Police Officer.

READ ALSO: Tinubu Clarifies When Subsidy Removal Will Take Effect

He denied knowledge of a February 4, 2003, Formal Clearance Report by Legal Attachee from the American Embassy in respect of the alleged indictment and forfeiture.

When asked by Fagbemi SAN to produce a copy of the charges against Tinubu, the witness admitted not having any but maintained that the indictment and forfeiture are from civil proceedings.

Meanwhile, the Presiding Justice of the Court, Justice Haruna Simon Tsammani, has shifted further hearing in the petition to May 31.

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles
INEC Deleted Presidential Election Results on BVAS Machine, Witness Tells Trinunal
Politics

INEC Breaks Silence on Chairman’s Sacking

INEC has denied rumors that its Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, has been...

Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Slams N5bn Lawsuit Against Nwaebonyi
Politics

Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Slams N5bn Lawsuit Against Nwaebonyi

The lawmaker representing Kogi Central Senatorial district in Kogi State, Senator Natasha...

2027: Atiku, Obi to Join SDP - 2023 Presidential Candidate
Politics

2027: Atiku, Obi to Join SDP – 2023 Presidential Candidate

The presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) for the 2023...

Atiku, Obi, Opposition Leaders Urge Electoral Reforms Ahead of 2027 Elections | Daily Report Nigeria
Politics

Atiku, Obi, Opposition Leaders Urge Electoral Reforms Ahead of 2027 Elections

Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, and Peter Ahmeh have called for urgent electoral...