Home Politics Femi Falana Reacts to Tinubu’s Intervention in Rivers Crisis
Politics

Femi Falana Reacts to Tinubu’s Intervention in Rivers Crisis

Share
Femi Falana Reacts to Tinubu's Intervention in Rivers Crisis | Daily Report Nigeria
Share

Human Rights Lawyer, Femi Falana, SAN has reacted to the recent intervention by President Bola Tinubu in the political crisis that rocked Rivers State.

Falana stated the importance of Tinubu’s intervention in the state crisis but stressed that it must always align with the provisions of the Constitution.

In a recent statement issued in Abuja, he pointed out that the presidential reinstatement of the 27 defected members of the Rivers State House of Assembly by the Presidency was fundamentally unconstitutional.

According to Falana, the members have forfeited their seats due to their defection from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

He said:
I agree with former Governor, Babatunde Fashola SAN, who has said that President Tinubu has no constitutional role in resolving the political crisis in Ondo and Rivers States. Therefore, the intervention of the President in both cases is purely advisory.

“The seats of the cross carpeting members have been declared vacant by the Speaker known to law. To that extent, the Independent National Electoral Commission is mandatorily required to conduct the by-election once the ex parte order issued by the Federal High Court last Friday is quashed.

“The PDP that sponsored them is not factionalised or divided as stipulated by the Constitution.

“Even if all the cases in the Rivers State High Court and the Federal High Court are withdrawn in line with the advice of the President, it is submitted that all actions taken by the Speaker recognised by the Rivers State High Court remain valid, including his pronouncement on the vacant seats of the 27 cross carpeting members of the House.

“In other words, only a Court of Law is constitutionally competent to set aside the pronouncement of the Speaker, which is anchored on Section 109 of the Constitution. Furthermore, as the Speaker has not been removed by the required number of legislators, a presidential directive cannot remove him.

“Given the foregoing, the President and all the parties involved in finding political solutions to the crisis in Rivers State are advised to turn to the Constitution for guidance without any further delay.”

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles
INEC Deleted Presidential Election Results on BVAS Machine, Witness Tells Trinunal
Politics

INEC Breaks Silence on Chairman’s Sacking

INEC has denied rumors that its Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, has been...

Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Slams N5bn Lawsuit Against Nwaebonyi
Politics

Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Slams N5bn Lawsuit Against Nwaebonyi

The lawmaker representing Kogi Central Senatorial district in Kogi State, Senator Natasha...

2027: Atiku, Obi to Join SDP - 2023 Presidential Candidate
Politics

2027: Atiku, Obi to Join SDP – 2023 Presidential Candidate

The presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) for the 2023...

Atiku, Obi, Opposition Leaders Urge Electoral Reforms Ahead of 2027 Elections | Daily Report Nigeria
Politics

Atiku, Obi, Opposition Leaders Urge Electoral Reforms Ahead of 2027 Elections

Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, and Peter Ahmeh have called for urgent electoral...